‹ Back to home

FF1600 standing starts: dialing in the Dual Clutch

There are several ways to launch a standing start. The easiest one that gives a strong and repeatable launch is to set a bite point: the clutch position the engine engages at when you drop it. You can use it with the dual clutch paddles on your wheel (if supported), or with a single clutch using iRacing’s launch control and bite point.

Set the bite point too high and the clutch slips — the car accelerates slower than it could; too low and the engine is pulled down toward a stall. We measured over six hundred clutch-drop launches to find the right value, how conditions move it, and a simple RPM check to find it on any track.

Every launch behind this article is available here: browse the full data — the complete temperature sweep, every setting at every temperature, followed by the earlier run-by-run sessions at Virginia and Mosport.

The cost of setting the wrong bite point

A wrong bite point can easily cost one to three tenths by the end of 1st gear alone — enough to lose (or gain) a position into the first corner.

A far-off guess

At Virginia, where the optimal bite point is 45, let's see the actual cost of guessing it wrong. The gap and speed are measured 5.23 s after the clutch release (~ 0.4s before the shift to 2nd gear):

Bite point	Time lost vs 45	Min RPM	Gap after 5.23 s	Speed after 5.23 s	What happens
30	+0.13 s	~750	3.7 m behind	99.5 km/h	Anti-stall intervenes to keep the engine alive
40	+0.06 s	990	1.7 m behind	100.9 km/h	Too aggressive — deep RPM drop, the engine labours
45	fastest	2260	reference	102.5 km/h	Optimal
50	+0.32 s	5810	8.7 m behind	96.0 km/h	Far too soft — the clutch slips and the car creeps off the line

The conclusion is clear: a far-off guess gives away metres before the first corner. Arriving on the grid with at least a rough idea of the right value is non-negotiable.

1–2 clicks off

Now let's see the actual cost of being just 1–2 clicks off the optimal, after the same 5.23 s:

Bite point	Time lost vs 45	Min RPM	Gap after 5.23 s	Speed after 5.23 s	Assessment
43	+0.024 s	1510	0.7 m behind	101.7 km/h	Slightly too aggressive
44	+0.011 s	1810	0.3 m behind	102.1 km/h	Near-optimal
45	fastest	2260	reference	102.5 km/h	Optimal
46	+0.007 s	3090	0.2 m behind	102.7 km/h	Near-optimal
47	+0.048 s	4120	1.4 m behind	102.2 km/h	Slightly too soft

For a standing start 0.7 m is already significant — it is the difference between having overlap and claiming the inside line into the first corner, or having to slot in behind. And these numbers cover 1st gear only: a wrong setting leaves you behind and slower, so the deficit keeps compounding down the opening straight.

The general case

The tables above are one session, at one track, in one condition. We then measured the same thing across 26 track temperatures at Rudskogen, from 64 to 89 °F, with a full sweep of settings 41 to 49 at each one. The gap is measured over the 83 metres to the end of 1st gear, against the optimal setting for that temperature:

Clicks off the optimum	Average gap	Worst gap
−3	1.08 m	1.26 m
−2	0.67 m	0.86 m
−1	0.31 m	0.77 m
optimum	reference	reference
+1	0.41 m	1.23 m
+2	1.96 m	3.01 m
+3	4.34 m	5.71 m

Not every temperature allows three clicks either side within the 41–49 range, so the outer rows are measured on fewer launches (19 to 24) than the inner ones (24 to 26).

Note also the asymmetry: a value too high costs more than the same error too low — 1.96 m two clicks above the optimum against 0.67 m two clicks below, averaged over the 26 temperatures. When unsure, err one click below the optimum, especially if track conditions might have changed between your practice run and the actual race start.

Find the optimal bite point for any car using Enduro Manager

The measurements in this article were made with Enduro Manager, and you can repeat them for any car.

In a test session, get to the grid, reset, launch, reset, and launch again as much as you want. Then analyse your results using Lap Compare.

Enduro Manager detects each reset and splits your telemetry into resets (ex: L1r2 for your second reset on lap 1). Enduro Manager also detects standing starts, so the time delta starts at the clutch release, so launches line up with each other and can be compared.

The “standing start” layout in Lap Compare

Lap Compare ships with a standing start layout: clutch, RPM, time delta, speed delta, etc. Time Delta is what shows you which launch was faster. You can then look at the RPM chart to see what an optimal launch looks like.

View this standing start telemetry — 8 launches compared

In this example:

• 41 is the reference (in red — Lap 0 reset 10)
• bite points 42 to 47 are all faster than 41, and 48 is much slower with +0.065 s
• bite point 45 (in pink — Lap 0 reset 6) is fastest with −0.055 s, tied with 46 (−0.053 s)

In this example, we can conclude that the optimal bite point is 45.

Temperature changes the optimal bite point a lot — and it’s not predictable

We measured 274 standing starts at Rudskogen: settings 41 to 49, at 26 track temperatures from 64 to 89 °F, one degree at a time. Same car, same setup, same gear stack, same grid box, same time of day, clear sky, 0% humidity, clean track. Only the temperature changed.

The optimal setting at each track temperature

The optimal bite point moved between 42 and 48 with no trend. Two temperatures one degree apart can want bite points five clicks apart: at 80 °F the optimum is 48, at 81 °F it is 42.

The results are repeatable. The same temperature tested in different sessions gives the same minimum RPM within 5 RPM. The optimal bite point is determined by the conditions — it is simply not predictable from those conditions.

Humidity moves it as well, and not in a fixed direction: in one of our tests, going from 0 to 100% humidity moved the optimum 2.2 clicks up at 75 °F, and 1.5 clicks down at 80 °F.

We checked three other tracks at matched temperatures. Each shows the same swing between those temperatures. At identical condition, the optimal settings also differed between tracks.

Because temperature alone moves the optimum by several clicks between neighbouring degrees, there is no point in measuring what the other factors contribute: a race one degree warmer than your practice session can take the optimum from 48 to 42 on its own.

Why does this happen? We have no explanation, and no physics phenomenon accounts for what we measured.

Our hypothesis, and it is only a hypothesis: the conditions do not change the physics of the launch much. iRacing introduces the variability on purpose, so that a fast launch cannot be dialled in by reading a bite point off a table, and a strong start still demands precise clutch work. At one temperature 44 behaves like a real 41, and at another like a real 47.

The guideline: do not memorize the bite point — use the minimum RPM

This is the part that transfers between tracks and conditions. Across every track and condition we have measured, the fastest launch always reaches roughly the same minimum RPM: about 2200–2800. What changes, between tracks and between conditions, is which bite point produces it. Instead of memorizing per-track values, perform one test launch and read the minimum RPM from your telemetry:

Min RPM	Diagnosis	Correction
4000+	Far too soft — the clutch slips, the car creeps	Lower the bite point 2–3 steps
~3000	Slightly too soft	Lower it 1 step
2200–2800	Ideal range	Keep it
~1800	Slightly too aggressive	Raise it 1 step
Below 1500	Too aggressive	Raise it 2–3 steps
~750	Anti-stall intervention	Raise it several steps

The easiest way is to review your minimum RPM in Enduro Manager after a test launch and dial the bite point in from there. You can also read it live off the tachometer during the launch — but stay sharp, the minimum only shows for a fraction of a second. And with some practice you will not need to look at all: the depth of the RPM drop is distinct enough to judge by ear.

Can we start even faster?

Yes. The Dual Clutch is a simplified way to launch: it holds one fixed engagement point for the whole start. But as this article shows, the optimal bite point cannot be known before a race — so clutch modulation is the only way to aim for the fastest possible start. A driver modulating the clutch manually through the launch — feeding it in progressively to keep the engine in its maximum-torque range the entire time — would extract more acceleration than any single fixed point can. But it is much harder to execute, and far harder to repeat under pressure on the grid.

Agree, disagree, want a track measured next? Join the discussion on Discord and bring your own data.